The Back Stage Casting Department puts great
effort into stopping scams from being published in Back Stage; blocking
spammers, scammers, and other bad guys from using the BackStage.com
Multimedia Resume Talent Database for illegitimate purposes; stopping
acting scams and modeling scams; and removing scams from Back Stage
whenever a casting notice turns out to be bogus.
However, sometimes con artists still slip through the cracks — so we
depend on our readers to let us know if they run into a problem. If you report a scam, we'll quickly investigate and remove any fake casting notices and scammers.
Here are five casting scams and suspicious situations to watch out for:
1) THE BAIT-&-SWITCH: If a company is charging
any fees or trying to sell a product or service, it should be clearly
listed in their casting notice; they shouldn't surprise you with hidden
or unexpected fees after you've applied to the project. You should
always know about all possible fees and costs upfront, whether it be
membership dues for theater groups and film collectives; tuition for
workshops and classes; registration/application fees; recording fees;
mandatory photography and marketing costs; etc. And talent agents and
managers should never charge upfront fees; they should only be paid via a
percentage-based commision when they book you work. Keep an eye out for
projects that try to "bait" you with a cool-sounding casting notice and
then "switch" things around at the last minute by trying to charge you
for something that wasn't mentioned in their original notice.
The charging of fees is often questionable. However, depending on the
situation (and state law) the fees may be totally legal. Regrettably,
fees are becoming prevalent among low-tier regional casting and talent
agencies (that might not try to illegally charge you for representation,
but instead will try to upsell you on photo packages and classes and
charge fees for including you on their websites, even though they're
representing you for "free") and recording studios and music producers
(that might put out a call to find talent for a band or music label, but
then try to charge some of the singers and musicians to record and
produce their tracks to help them "break into the industry"). But if
they're legit at all, they'll at least let you know about all the
required fees upfront.
2) CHECK FRAUD & WIRE-TRANSFER SCHEMES: A common
scam involves a person or company (usually operating under a fake name
or stolen identity) offering to cast you in a project that will later
turn out to not exist. They might mention their company name and send
you a link to their website; but in reality they're not really
associated with the company or website they say they're working for. And
usually they won't even bother auditioning you; they'll just say they
want to hire you right away. And then they'll offer to pay you upfront, before you've even done the gig. This is a classic case of, "it's too good to be true."
What happens next is that they'll either ask you for your banking
information so they can deposit money into your account (but instead
they'll try to steal your money). Or, to make themselves seem less
suspicious, they'll send you a check in the mail. Sometimes they'll even
send the check via next-day-delivery. And the check will be for even more money
than they said they'd send you! This is where things get really tricky:
The con artists will come up with an excuse for why they sent you too
much money. They'll ask you to send them some of the money back. To
sweeten the deal, they'll probably offer to let you keep some of the
extra money for yourself, as a bonus, in exchange for sending them some
of the money back or for sending some of the money on to someone else
that's also supposedly working on the project.
They might ask you to send the money through the mail, but more
likely they'll ask you to send the money via a wire service like Western Union.
The name and address you wire the money to doesn't really matter;
money-transfer services like Western Union allow anyone to pick up funds
from anywhere in the world regardless of the name and address the money
was sent to; all the scammer needs is the access code for picking up
the money. Eventually you'll find out that the check they sent you was a
fake or stolen or connected to an empty account; your bank won't give
you the money (or they'll take it back) and you could be fined for
trying to cash a bad check. And by then the scammers, somewhere else in
the world, will already have the "extra" money you wired them — your
money. And they'll be untraceable.
These types of scammers usually have terrible grammar and a bad
understanding of entertainment-industry terminology. And they're
especially fond of offering fake modeling jobs for clothing catalogs,
textile companies, and commercials for projects that involve lots of
"exotic travel" and "great pay." But beware of any gig that offers to
pay you upfront with a check or asks you for your bank details before
you've even auditioned.
3) AUDITION & SUBMISSION FEES: There are a few
times when it might be legal to require an actor, model, or performer to
pay a fee to be considered for a project. For instance, a live talent
competition or an online video contest can charge an entry fee. And some
professional dance organizations charge a small fee to take a
choreography class before their auditions (a number of professional
sports teams do this for their dance- and cheer-squad auditions).
However, charging audition and submission fees is not typical in most
cases; it's frowned upon by the unions; it could be considered a "pay to play" scam;
and it may be in violation of several state and federal labor laws that
prohibit employers from charging prospective employees for the
opportunity to be considered for a job (an audition is a job interview,
even if you're working for free). If an audition, submission,
registration, or entry fee is required, then at the very least this
requirement should be clearly listed in the project's casting notice in
Back Stage, or else it falls into the "bait & switch" territory
mentioned above.
4) UNEXPECTED NUDITY: If a project is casting for a
role that requires any nudity or sexual situations, then reference to
the nudity and sexual aspects of the plot should be included in the
project's casting notice. Typically, any nudity requirements for a
specific role will be listed in the character's breakdown (the character
description) in the casting notice; but sometimes there will be a note
somewhere else in the casting notice that explains that multiple roles
will involve nudity or sexual situations.
If a casting notice does not say anything about nudity, then the
project indicated to Back Stage that no nudity was involved. If they
surprise you with a request for nudity after you've applied to the
project, then something is amiss; if they were being honest, they would
have listed the nudity in their original casting notice.
Also, even for projects that have been upfront about nudity
requirements, it's usually very inappropriate to ask for nudity at the
first round of auditions. Beware of projects that require nudity at your
first audition; this could be a serious danger sign, or at least a sign
of unprofessionalism. Don't cave in to pressure or aggressive tactics;
simply decline. If the people casting the project made you feel
uncomfortable, then don't work with them. If a project is serious, they
won't ask for nudity until the call-back auditions or possibly not until
you're actually on set; you'll know well ahead of time about the
requirement; and everyone will behave in a professional manner.
It's also always a good idea to bring a friend along with you to any
audition location that you think might be questionable; or any
out-of-the-way audition location you haven't been to before; etc. There
are perverts and dangerous people out there, so be safe, be cautious,
and always let your friends know when and where you're auditioning and
when you'll be back.
Also beware of projects that ask you to appear nude while auditioning
you online (e.g., a video-chat audition through a service like Skype).
To make themselves appear innocent, sometimes these webcam scammers
will come up with "good" excuses for why the nudity is required: A
common scam is for the fake producer/director to say they're casting
for a commercial, infomercial, or documentary about breastfeeding,
breast pumps, or nursing bras. The projects aren't real, and the
scammers could be secretly recording your "online audition" for their
own purposes.
5) BOGUS CASTING WEBSITES: Watch out for casting
websites that promise casting calls for big-name movies and television
programs — a lot of disreputable casting sites have fake casting notices
for real projects. They might grab the real project details for major
feature films and TV shows from legit websites like BackStage.com and
IMDb, to make their casting notices sound real; but when you use these
sites to submit to projects online, your submissions will go nowhere.
Sometimes scammers will even include an email address in their fake
casting notices, but the email accounts are secretly being controlled by
the swindlers and not the real casting directors; when you email your
pix & résumés, you'll get added to the scammer's spam list but
you'll never get cast. Or the site might be stealing old audition
notices and breakdowns from real casting sites — bad casting sites have
been known to edit old casting notices copied from other websites,
making the notices sound like they're still current and calling for
submissions from lots of different types of actors, but in reality the
projects have already finished casting, and the casting directors will
have no idea that their casting notices are still running on these other
casting websites they've never even heard of. For instance, ActorsClub is a known spammer with lots of complaints on file. Check the Back Stage forums to get feedback on sites you're not sure about.
Luke Crowe, National Casting Editor, Back Stage
Big Picture Talent
Free Unsolicited Encouragement for Actors
Classic Hollywood Bloopers
Ever wonder if acting legends like Humphrey Bogart, Jimmy Stewart,
Bette Davis, or Carole Lombard flubbed their lines? Or cursed? Check out
this great collection of candid clips from classic Hollywood films.
You'll notice how apologetic the actors are and how upset the
directors sometimes get. Remember, this is back in the day before
digital, where film was expensive and you could get fired for wasting
time!
Posted by Jessica Gardner
Posted by Jessica Gardner
A Quick Quiz to Determine If You Are a Dance Insider
Like any rarefied field, dance has its own particular jargon. So in
their efforts to describe or sound more knowledgeable about the
subject, people are apt to rattle off terms like "plié" and "grand
jeté" or to sprinkle their conversation with words such as
"kinesthetically" or "Fosse-esque." However, it's not in the
employment of specialized terminology but rather in the use of the
tiny, ordinary words that one's level of dance expertise is often
more accurately revealed. Over the years, I've encountered five
common language discrepancies that almost always distinguish the
dance world insider from the layman. Which are you? How well you do
on the following five-question quiz may be a good indicator.
Question #1: Would you say (a) "That choreography was created on those four dancers" or (b) "That choreography was created for those four dancers"? If you picked (a) it is likely that you're an insider. Rarely does a choreographer create a dance for the dancers. He creates it for himself, to fulfill his artistic vision, or for a production, a scene, or even a character, but usually not for dancers. There are two exceptions: a solo routine that a choreographer might make for a competition dancer, designed to show off that individual's skills; or a special solo a choreographer might be invited to create for an esteemed ballerina as a "gift" in her honor, or for a special anniversary or gala performance. Most lasting choreography is danced by many performers, and even though the original dancers may have contributed to it in significant ways, saying that it was created for them is simply not correct.
Yet while the phrase "choreographed on"—whether followed by dancers or even the name of a company—is logical and commonly used within the dance world, for some reason laymen insist on changing the phrase to "choreographed for." This error is a pet peeve of mine. I have had it changed on me numerous times by editors of my writing—though never in this publication! This compromises my credibility as an authority or at least a "card-carrying," lifelong member of the dance community. On one occasion such undermining was exacerbated by juxtaposition. Following a sentence I had written, wherein the editor changed my "on" to "for," came a quote from the ballerina Suzanne Farrell. She described a work as "the first ballet Mr. B. made on me." Ironically, as the celebrated muse of George Balanchine, Farrell enjoyed such a special artistic and personal relationship with the great choreographer that she might rightly have described a Balanchine ballet as having been choreographed for her. But she didn't. She is a dancer, so as would be expected, she said "on."
Question #2: What are "the splits"? This is an honest question, as I really have no idea what people mean when they refer to the splits. No one in the dance world ever uses that term. So if you know the answer to this question, please tell us. Whereas we might say we are doing "a split" (and might specify doing it with the right or the left leg) or even a straddle split or a split jump, I have never heard any dance teacher or choreographer say "the splits." But for those outside the dance community doing "the splits"—whatever they imagine them to be—is frequently set out as the standard by which dance ability is measured. Though I had for some time thought this was an old-fashioned term from before I was born, just a few months ago a woman told me that the reason she chose not to study dance was because she knew she could never do the splits.
Question #3: How frequently do you use the word "moves," as a noun, to describe steps or elements of a piece of choreography? The dancer answer here is never. Steps, movements, gestures, physical vocabulary—these are all legitimately terpsichorean ways of describing dance. Only laymen compliment a dancer's "moves."
Question #4: On which syllable do you place the primary accent when pronouncing the word "ballet"? If you have ever taken even a beginner ballet technique class, squeezed your foot into a pointe shoe, or spent any time around balletomanes, you will naturally accent the first syllable. Most Americans, on the other hand, place the accent assuredly on the second.
Question #5: When changing into dance gear, are you donning (a) "a leotard" or (b) "leotards"? If you answered in the plural, the dance world will assume you are in possession of multiple torsos. Dancers use the word "leotard" to refer to the stretchy garment that covers the torso (and sometimes part of the legs as well). Yet while a leotard can be accompanied by a separate pair of tights (covering the legs), the two garments together are called "leotards" only by those who've never worn them.
Question #1: Would you say (a) "That choreography was created on those four dancers" or (b) "That choreography was created for those four dancers"? If you picked (a) it is likely that you're an insider. Rarely does a choreographer create a dance for the dancers. He creates it for himself, to fulfill his artistic vision, or for a production, a scene, or even a character, but usually not for dancers. There are two exceptions: a solo routine that a choreographer might make for a competition dancer, designed to show off that individual's skills; or a special solo a choreographer might be invited to create for an esteemed ballerina as a "gift" in her honor, or for a special anniversary or gala performance. Most lasting choreography is danced by many performers, and even though the original dancers may have contributed to it in significant ways, saying that it was created for them is simply not correct.
Yet while the phrase "choreographed on"—whether followed by dancers or even the name of a company—is logical and commonly used within the dance world, for some reason laymen insist on changing the phrase to "choreographed for." This error is a pet peeve of mine. I have had it changed on me numerous times by editors of my writing—though never in this publication! This compromises my credibility as an authority or at least a "card-carrying," lifelong member of the dance community. On one occasion such undermining was exacerbated by juxtaposition. Following a sentence I had written, wherein the editor changed my "on" to "for," came a quote from the ballerina Suzanne Farrell. She described a work as "the first ballet Mr. B. made on me." Ironically, as the celebrated muse of George Balanchine, Farrell enjoyed such a special artistic and personal relationship with the great choreographer that she might rightly have described a Balanchine ballet as having been choreographed for her. But she didn't. She is a dancer, so as would be expected, she said "on."
Question #2: What are "the splits"? This is an honest question, as I really have no idea what people mean when they refer to the splits. No one in the dance world ever uses that term. So if you know the answer to this question, please tell us. Whereas we might say we are doing "a split" (and might specify doing it with the right or the left leg) or even a straddle split or a split jump, I have never heard any dance teacher or choreographer say "the splits." But for those outside the dance community doing "the splits"—whatever they imagine them to be—is frequently set out as the standard by which dance ability is measured. Though I had for some time thought this was an old-fashioned term from before I was born, just a few months ago a woman told me that the reason she chose not to study dance was because she knew she could never do the splits.
Question #3: How frequently do you use the word "moves," as a noun, to describe steps or elements of a piece of choreography? The dancer answer here is never. Steps, movements, gestures, physical vocabulary—these are all legitimately terpsichorean ways of describing dance. Only laymen compliment a dancer's "moves."
Question #4: On which syllable do you place the primary accent when pronouncing the word "ballet"? If you have ever taken even a beginner ballet technique class, squeezed your foot into a pointe shoe, or spent any time around balletomanes, you will naturally accent the first syllable. Most Americans, on the other hand, place the accent assuredly on the second.
Question #5: When changing into dance gear, are you donning (a) "a leotard" or (b) "leotards"? If you answered in the plural, the dance world will assume you are in possession of multiple torsos. Dancers use the word "leotard" to refer to the stretchy garment that covers the torso (and sometimes part of the legs as well). Yet while a leotard can be accompanied by a separate pair of tights (covering the legs), the two garments together are called "leotards" only by those who've never worn them.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)

